Welcome!

Oracle Authors: Pat Romanski

Related Topics: Java, Wireless, SOA & WOA, Open Web, Oracle

Java: Article

PTO Strengthens Oracle’s Java Case

It decided that nine of the patents claims are perfectly valid

The US Patent and Trademark Office has reconsidered its so-called "final" rejection of one of the Java patents that Oracle claimed Google infringed and decided that nine of the patents claims are perfectly valid.

Apparently Oracle got wind of the PTO's change of mind late last week and rushed in Sunday to tell the court about.

Conveniently, the claims upheld match Oracle's to a "T" with a little to spare, and, as FOSS Patents points out, there's nothing quite like teeth of a re-examined patent.

Google, of course, is going to squawk but the way Oracle left it with the court it would only assert patents that weren't rejected by the PTO. And here the PTO has validated one neatly ahead of the patent side of the case getting heard so it's likely that Google will have to face charges of violating three Java patents not the whittled-away two.

The claims upheld are part of US Patent No 5,966,702 on a "method and apparatus for pre-processing and packaging class files" and include 1, 5-7, 11-13, 15 and 16. Oracle only charged Google on claims 1, 6-7, 12, 13, 15 and 16.

See www.fosspatents.com/2012/04/oracle-java-patent-rises-like-phoenix.html.

More Stories By Maureen O'Gara

Maureen O'Gara the most read technology reporter for the past 20 years, is the Cloud Computing and Virtualization News Desk editor of SYS-CON Media. She is the publisher of famous "Billygrams" and the editor-in-chief of "Client/Server News" for more than a decade. One of the most respected technology reporters in the business, Maureen can be reached by email at maureen(at)sys-con.com or paperboy(at)g2news.com, and by phone at 516 759-7025. Twitter: @MaureenOGara

Comments (0)

Share your thoughts on this story.

Add your comment
You must be signed in to add a comment. Sign-in | Register

In accordance with our Comment Policy, we encourage comments that are on topic, relevant and to-the-point. We will remove comments that include profanity, personal attacks, racial slurs, threats of violence, or other inappropriate material that violates our Terms and Conditions, and will block users who make repeated violations. We ask all readers to expect diversity of opinion and to treat one another with dignity and respect.